A: My suggestion, do a disclaimer that says, “This post best viewed in…” and state how it is best viewed, designers do this on their fancy sites. My design is crazy. I do all sorts of things with my fonts and my colors, I have fun with it, because this blog is best viewed on the blog. That is how I test it, that is how it works best. I would not change my format for one viewer, even though I have also had complaints in about how it is viewed in reader. Just simply tell her that your blog is best viewed in blog format and to suggest that she visit your site instead of reading it through reader. All she would have to do is click on the link in reader and it would take her to your blog. Problem solved. If she doesn’t want to do that, well then, you might loose a reader.
When things like this come in you should take into account the severity of the problem. If it was 100 people complaining, I would say change it. But with just one, I wouldn’t worry about it as much.
Suggest, maybe do a poll to your readers and see exactly how many people have a problem with it. Majority are seeing it as a bad thing…it might be time to change things up.
A: Once you modify your templates it is sometimes a lot harder to make changes to, actually much harder then if you leave it as the blogger template. It is why I do my designs within the New Blogger Template. You step out of the confines it becomes harder for later modifications by the user. Blogger doesn’t accept “regular” coding so you might want to look into what you inserted. I found sometimes if I just add a / at the end of a code line it will work. These are for those codes that in HTML don’t need a closing like the image tag, but blogger is a stickler and will ask for it to close. You would not see a THAT IS WRONG. So you would
and add that close tag at the end.
You really should get your friend that designed the template involved though. See if you can upgrade it to the new blogger templates, sometimes it is an easy fix. If that isn’t an option, email me the link to your website and I’ll take a look at it. If it is an easy conversion that might be your best option.
A: The book images are going to fall under the “Fair Use” copyright laws. You are reviewing a product and using it in an editorial fashion so, no you do not have to cite sources. As long as you are not trying to pass off the book image as your own, or use it in an advertisement you are good to go.
A: From experience I now state that I am not responsible for lost or damaged products that are shipped. I had a winner get upset with me because the product had been damaged in the mail. They wanted another one. Yeah that was fun. Now I can kindly refer them back to the legalities that I put in all my contests.
I’ve also had winners that was upset that a package never arrived, I’ve had this happen a few times, actually, gotta love the post office. This really upsets me just as much as the winner, you are only as good as your reputation. One time I was shipping internationally and the package just “disappeared”. I had sent it USPS and the winner said it just didn’t get ther. These were signed books and I was really upset because there was no replacing them. I should have done insured or something, but hindsight is 20/20 right? Then some were from publishers or direct from the authors and I think that they might just not have gotten around to it or forgotten. Emails to them were not returned. I don’t like to give “Oh well” responses, but sometimes there is only so much you can do. So, I like to put disclaimers that you are not responsible for lost in shipping or books shipped from 3rd parties. It doesn’t make me feel any better but at least it gives you a generic “way out” if things get ugly between you and a contest winner. Things happen with contests, I’ve had the opposite where contest recipients got like 30 copies of one book in three shipments. That was crazy. It can’t always go smoothly, so make sure you protect yourself if something squirrly happens.
In large company giveaways they makes sure that they, have the “No Pur
chase Necessary” rule because technically it is illegal as stated by the FTC in some crazy out-dated law. But, technically, from what I’ve read, it is illegal. They are considered private lotteries. Meaning you have to this and this and this — to get a chance to win this. But, it seems lately tons of people are doing this lately, and not just us book bloggers. Big publishers —> Like us on Facebook to win XXX. Even my local CBS affiliate was doing a LIKE to get a TV promo.
These are just things to think of. From what I know, there hasn’t been a book blogger that has had problems with giveaways. We are small potatoes compared to some and we are giving away books, not millions of dollars. You might want to think of some scenarios and right up rules against those, to sort of have a STOP in place when people complain, but other than that, it is open range.
A: I would request each one in a separate email. You would put the BOOK’S name in the subject line for each. You might want to cite in the email that you are also requesting these books… and that you sent separate emails.
A: Sherri, I’ve never gotten anything positive out of emails like this, in fact I’ve never responded. From what I can make of it, it is only a link exchange to increase their “clients’ page ranking, but really most of the SEO people that I have spoken with say blogs are really inconsequential when it comes to big corporations page rankings. I don’t see how sponsoring a post would make good business practices for a company. That being said, my mind screams SCAM. If it was legitimate she might have stated the client’s name. Good Luck. Cute “To Protect The Innocent” btw.
A: I actually saved this one until I could launch the Book Blogger Directory, so sorry Kelley for the long answering time!
Google Page Rank is Google’s algorithm. Fancy term for Google’s magic way of ranking your web site.
Google assigns a number to your site and this number determines your significance in their eyes. The higher your number, in theory the higher you will show in their search results. This is why you should care, don’t you want people to find you?
Let’s say Kitty and her webpage Kitty’s Kit & Pages, has a page ranking of 3 and they are primarily focused on the keywords of < Urban Fantasy, Science Fiction and Paranormal Romance >
Her keyword competitor is Gini’s Giant Genre Fest who has a page ranking of 5. Unfortunately because Gini has the happy 5 Page Rank, she is going to come up first.
You increase your Page Rank by having other sites link to you. Google thinks that if you have other “powerful sites” linking to you, well than you must be someone, so they increase your ranking. And like anything else quality is much better than quality. Because if you have 1K other blogsites linking to you, that all have a 0 Page Rank, it’s not going to do anything for your Page Rank. If you have 100 links to blogs and sites with Page Ranks of 2 and above…watch your Page Rank grow. The higher Page Rank sites you link to the higher your site grows. You can surpass your highest link, but you can match it.
So, how do you find out your Page Rank. Best way to do it is to download the Google Toolbar and it will show you the Page Rank for every page you visit. Download the bar for Firefox and go and search out high ranking blogs and ask for a link. Couldn’t hurt.
Which brings us back to the Book Blogger Directory. The site is just getting started and will take a bit of time to get rolling but the general principal is…everyone will be linking to the Book Blogger Directory, so the Page Rank has to go up! But then you have a link on the Book Blogger Directory so your Page Rank has to go up! Win Win. Genius right? Yeah, I can’t help it. Well, alright I didn’t think of the idea, there is this thing called the Yellow Pages that already kind of thought of it. So, give them all the credit.
That’s it kids. Talk less. Read more. Happy Thursday!
Ask your BB101 Questions here…